New review sheds light on morphine’s extraction, structural complexity, and dual role in pain relief and addiction
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Journal Center
image: Opium poppy
Credit: Article authors: Javeriya Ahrar, Md. Nematullah, Md. Azizur Rahman . Image: F. Aragón-Poce, E. Martínez-Fernández, C. Márquez-Espinós.
A recent review published in LabMed Discovery offers a comprehensive analysis of morphine, a cornerstone opioid in modern medicine, delving into its extraction, structural properties, and multifaceted pharmacological effects. The study underscores morphine’s critical role in alleviating moderate to severe pain, particularly in palliative care, post-surgical recovery, and cancer treatment, while also addressing its significant risks, including addiction, respiratory depression, and tolerance.
The review traces morphine’s historical roots, from ancient opium use in 5000 B.C. to its isolation by Friedrich Sertürner in 1805, marking a pivotal moment in medicinal chemistry. Modern extraction and purification methods are detailed, emphasizing the use of alkaline alcoholic solutions and organic solvents like toluene to isolate morphine from Papaver somniferum. The paper also explores advanced synthetic routes, such as the Diels-Alder reaction, which enables the total synthesis of morphine in nine steps, offering potential for cost-effective pharmaceutical production.
Structurally, morphine’s tetracyclic phenanthrene core and key functional groups (hydroxyl, methoxy, and tertiary amine) are examined for their role in binding opioid receptors (μ, κ, δ). The study highlights how modifications to these groups—such as methylation or halogenation—can enhance potency or alter receptor affinity, as seen in derivatives like buprenorphine and etorphine.
Clinically, morphine’s efficacy is demonstrated across diverse pain scenarios:
· Burn pain: Intravenous morphine significantly reduces pain and anxiety in emergency settings.
· Chronic pain: Sustained-release oral morphine remains the gold standard, though long-term use raises concerns about tolerance and dependence.
· Post-operative pain: Low-dose IV morphine proves effective for spine surgery recovery, balancing analgesia with safety.
· Cancer pain: Rapid IV titration provides relief for severe cases, while topical morphine shows promise for painful mucosal lesions.
· Despite its therapeutic benefits, the review cautions against morphine’s potential for misuse, dependency, and adverse effects like constipation and respiratory depression. The authors advocate for vigilant monitoring and further research into safer alternatives and optimized dosing strategies.
The study concludes by emphasizing morphine’s irreplaceable role in pain management while calling for innovations to mitigate its risks. With no reported conflicts of interest, this review serves as a vital resource for clinicians and researchers navigating the complexities of opioid therapy.
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.