Madrid, Spain – 31 August 2025: Drug-coated stents and balloons were not associated with reduced risk of amputation or improved quality of life compared with uncoated devices in two trials in peripheral artery disease (PAD), according to late-breaking research presented in a Hot Line session today at ESC Congress 2025.1
Explaining the rationale for the trials, Principal Co-Investigator, Professor Joakim Nordanstig from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, said: “Drug-coated balloons and stents have been shown to reduce restenosis and the need for reinterventions in the endovascular treatment of PAD. However, there are uncertainties regarding whether drug-coated devices improve outcomes that are meaningful to patients, quality of life and reducing amputations, and there are some concerns over safety. We investigated these and other endpoints in two trials in PAD – one in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia and one in intermittent claudication – comparing drug-coated and uncoated devices.”
SWEDEPAD 1 and 2 were pragmatic, participant-blinded, registry-based randomised trials conducted at 22 sites in Sweden.
In SWEDEPAD 1, 2,355 patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (Rutherford stage 4–6) undergoing infra-inguinal endovascular treatment were randomised 1:1 to drug-coated or uncoated balloons or stents. In nearly all of the drug-coated devices implanted, the drug delivered was paclitaxel (>99%). There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of time to ipsilateral above-ankle amputation with drug-coated vs. uncoated devices (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.27) over 5 years of follow-up. Target vessel reinterventions were reduced in the drug-coated group during the first year (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98), but this difference disappeared with longer follow-up. There was no difference in all-cause mortality or in quality of life (as assessed using the VascuQoL-6 questionnaire).
In SWEDEPAD 2, 1,155 patients with intermittent claudication (Rutherford stage 1–3) undergoing infra-inguinal endovascular treatment were randomised 1:1 after successful guidewire crossing to receive either drug-coated or uncoated balloons or stents. All drug-coated devices implanted delivered paclitaxel. There was no difference in the primary efficacy endpoint of quality of life between the drug-coated and uncoated groups at 12 months (mean difference in VascuQoL-6 scores: –0.02; 95% CI –0.66 to 0.62). Target vessel reintervention rates were not different at 1 year or over a median follow-up of 6.2 years. All-cause mortality did not differ over 7.1 years (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.48), although higher 5-year mortality was noted with drug-coated vs. uncoated devices (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.98).
Summarising the findings, Principal Co-Investigator, Professor Mårten Falkenberg from Sahlgrenska University Hospital and the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, said: “Paclitaxel-coated devices were not effective in preventing amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia or improving quality of life in intermittent claudication. Given the signal of increased mortality with intermittent claudication, clinicians should carefully evaluate the potential risks and benefits when considering these expensive devices. Devices incorporating antiproliferative agents other than paclitaxel warrant further investigation in PAD.”
Notes to editor
This press release accompanies both a presentation and an ESC press conference at ESC Congress 2025.
It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Society of Cardiology.
Funding: This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation and Region Västra Götaland.
Disclosures: Professor Nordanstig and Professor Falkenberg report no disclosures related to this work.
References and notes:
1‘SWEDEPAD 1 and 2: Impact of drug-coated devices in patients with peripheral arterial disease’ presented during HOT LINE 6 on 31 August 2025 at 08:15 to 08:25 in Madrid (Main Auditorium).
ESC Press Office
Tel: +33 661401884
Email: press@escardio.org
The hashtag for ESC Congress 2025 is #ESCCongress
Follow us on LinkedIn @European Society of Cardiology News
Journalists are invited to become accredited and register here.
Check out the ESC Media and Embargo Policy.
It is the world’s largest gathering of cardiovascular professionals, disseminating ground-breaking science both onsite in Madrid and online – from 29 August to 1 September 2025. Explore the scientific programme. More information is available from the ESC Press Office at press@escardio.org.
About the European Society of Cardiology
The ESC brings together healthcare professionals from more than 150 countries, working to advance cardiovascular medicine and help people to live longer, healthier lives.