News Release

Hanyang University ERICA researcher reveals psychological pathways shaping behavior of customer witnessing robot mistreatment

The response—behavioral contagion or empathy—depends on factors such as robot’s anthropomorphism and the customer’s moral identity

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Hanyang University Research Strategy Planning Team

Behavior of Customers Witnessing Robot Mistreatment

image: 

Researchers identify two distinct psychologicl pathways in this context: behavioral contagion and empathy, highlighting the importance of anthromorphism and moral identity.

view more 

Credit: Taeshik Gong from Hanyang University ERICA

While many studies have explored direct human–robot interactions in sectors such as hospitality, retail, and healthcare, little is known about how customers react when they witness another person mistreating a service robot—a growing concern in technology-enabled service environments.

In a recent study, a research team led by Professor Taeshik Gong of Hanyang University ERICA, Republic of Korea, addressed this gap through experimental studies using video-based customer–robot interactions. The findings were published online on 20 August 2025 and have been published in Volume 88 of the Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

The researchers identify two distinct psychological pathways—behavioral contagion, which leads to the normalization of incivility, and empathy, which elicits moral concern and prosocial behavior. The findings show that whether observers mimic the incivility or respond with empathy depends on factors such as the robot’s humanlike design and the observer’s moral identity. This is the first empirical evidence that third-party observers can play a pivotal role in shaping norms around respectful or disrespectful treatment of service robots, with important implications for the design, deployment, and ethical use of robots in hospitality, retail, and other service settings.

These findings are expected to revolutionize diverse fields. “An application of our research is in hotels, restaurants, airports, and retail stores, where robots increasingly serve customers. Managers can design training protocols for employees and visible norm cues such as signage, scripted responses, and pre-recorded reminders to discourage customer mistreatment of robots. This helps prevent a contagion of incivility among bystanders and promotes a respectful service climate,” explains Prof. Gong. 

Notably, this study shows that anthropomorphism influences empathy. Designers can use humanlike cues, including expressive eyes, emotive voices, and subtle gestures, in frontline robots to increase bystanders’ empathic responses when mistreatment occurs. This does not just improve likability, but also acts as a moral signal—encouraging customers to treat robots with more dignity and reducing the spread of abusive behavior.

Moreover, companies can integrate prosocial messaging into customer touchpoints. These interventions raise awareness that mistreating robots has social and ethical implications, even if the robots themselves are nonhuman. This research also provides evidence to support emerging policy discussions about whether and how robots should be protected in public spaces. If observers perceive robots as legitimate victims under certain conditions, organizations or regulators may consider codes of conduct or ethical guidelines for human–robot interaction in customer-facing settings.

Prof. Gong says, “Even though the study focuses on customers, the findings matter for employees too. If the mistreatment of robots is normalized, this may spillover into how customers treat human staff. Conversely, reinforcing prosocial norms toward robots can strengthen the overall moral climate of the service environment, benefiting employees’ dignity and customer satisfaction simultaneously. Within a decade, we may see relevant codes of conduct, workplace guidelines, or even legal provisions.”

Overall, this breakthrough work can pave the way for normal, respectful human–robot interaction, influence robot design standards and ethical and policy frameworks, spillover into human relationships, and prepare us for human–AI futures.  These findings also call for ethical robot-use guidelines to ensure respectful and prosocial human–AI interactions.

 

***

 

Reference
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104482

 

 

About Hanyang University ERICA
Hanyang University ERICA (Education Research Industry Cluster at Ansan) is a prominent research-focused campus established in 1979 in Ansan, South Korea. ERICA offers undergraduate and graduate programs. ERICA is renowned for its active industry-university cooperation, offering students hands-on experience through partnerships with various industries. This ensures that graduates are well-prepared to meet societal needs and excel in their respective fields. With state-of-the-art facilities and a supportive learning environment, Hanyang University ERICA empowers students to pursue their passions and contribute meaningfully to society, staying true to the university's founding philosophy of "Love in Deed and Truth."

Website: https://www.hanyang.ac.kr/web/eng/erica-campus1

 

About the author
Prof. Taeshik Gong is a Professor of Marketing at Hanyang University ERICA, Republic of Korea. His research focuses on customer behavior, human–robot interaction, service management, and consumer psychology. He has published in leading journals, including the Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Journal of Service Research, and Management Decision. He currently serves as Associate Editor for the Journal of Consumer Marketing and Current Psychology. Prof. Gong’s contributions have been recognized internationally, with listings among Elsevier’s World’s Top 2% Scientists in 2022 and 2024.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.