image: This graph shows the total cost of ownership for different used vehicles that are 3 years old at the time of purchase and driven until their 10th year. Used battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have the lowest total cost of ownership when compared with internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) for every body style, according to new research from the University of Michigan.
Credit: M. Woody et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 2026 DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ae38f8
Now is a great time for anyone who's shopping for a used car to consider an electric vehicle, according to new research from the University of Michigan.
In assessing the lifetime ownership costs of used vehicles with different body styles and powertrains, the researchers found that completely electrified candidates offered the greatest savings.
For example, compared with a new midsized SUV with an internal combustion engine, a 3-year-old used EV version offered a lifetime savings of $13,000, according to the new study published in Environmental Research Letters. Meanwhile, compared with that same new vehicle, a used internal combustion engine vehicle, or ICEV, would offer a lifetime savings of only $3,000.
"Transportation is the second-largest portion of the average household's budget and, in the new vehicle market, EVs are usually more expensive," said Maxwell Woody, the lead author of the study. Woody is a research assistant at the U-M Center for Sustainable Systems, or CSS, and the School for Environment and Sustainability, or SEAS. "But 70% of all vehicle purchases are used, and used EVs have the lowest cost of ownership across vehicle classes."
Kicking the virtual tires
To analyze lifetime ownership costs, the team used virtual vehicle models from Argonne National Laboratory, monthly gas and electricity prices from 17 U.S. cities, and data from Craigslist ads for used cars posted in 2024. Sabina Tomkins, assistant professor at the U-M School of Information, led the team's cohort that gathered the Craigslist data, which included 260,000 listings after screening 4 million raw data points.
Combining the real-world information with Argonne's models enabled the researchers to assess the purchase price of a vehicle. The total cost of ownership was then determined by combining purchase and depreciation data with data gathered for recurring costs including fees, repairs, insurance, maintenance and fueling or charging in different parts of the country.
"I was surprised by how consistent the result was. I expected EVs would be cheaper in some scenarios, for some cities or vehicle types," Woody said. "But their costs were consistently lower across all vehicle classes and in almost all the cities."
Although the comparatively high cost of new EVs has limited their adoption in the U.S., this study could help more drivers choose used vehicles with lower carbon emissions, said senior author Greg Keoleian.
"Encouraging more adoption of EVs is key to decarbonizing the transportation sector and cost is a big factor in purchasing decisions," said Keoleian, a professor at SEAS and co-director of the CSS. "So this is positive news, I think, for helping encourage consumers to buy EVs."
The study's authors also included Antara Green and Christian Hitt at CSS and Sally Yin and Alexander Liu at the School of Information. The study was supported by the Responsible Battery Coalition.
Appreciating depreciation
While EV's low cost of ownership is the take-home message of the study, the team's analysis also revealed some notable caveats and considerations.
For instance, used EVs cut costs the most when drivers can do the majority of their charging at home. That means drivers who can't install a home charger or who need to charge a lot on the road won't save as much. The team also found that EVs' lifetime cost of ownership could creep above ICEVs and hybrids in two cities, Boston and San Francisco, because of their high electricity costs.
The team also acknowledged concerns about the battery performance of a used EV, which won't match a new EV's in terms of capacity and range. Thus, used EVs may not be a fit for long-haul drivers, but can offer thousands in lifetime savings for drivers who largely stay local. And that advantage is primarily fueled by how quickly EVs currently lose value compared with other powertrains.
"Electric vehicles have lower maintenance and repair costs than other powertrains, but the initial depreciation of the vehicle is really what drives the savings," Woody said.
As EV adoption becomes more common, the depreciation gap would shrink and the playing field would become more level across powertrains. But, for now, depreciation is creating a bargain for anyone considering a used EV.
"It's not the most positive news if you're in the market for a new EV, knowing that your resale value may be impacted by the faster depreciation," Keoleian said. "But if you're in the market for a used vehicle, it's very positive news."
The researchers have already started monitoring resale data for 2026 to keep an eye on this trend moving forward.
Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Article Title
Total Cost of Ownership of Electric and Gasoline Used Vehicles
Article Publication Date
27-Jan-2026