It is one of the strangest puzzles in human evolution. About 90% of people across every human culture favour their right hand - with no other primate species showing a population-level preference on this scale. Despite decades of research into the brains, genes and development behind handedness, why humans ended up so overwhelmingly right-handed has remained an evolutionary enigma.
Now, new research led by the University of Oxford, published in PLOS Biology, suggests the answer comes down to two defining features of human evolution - walking on two legs, and the dramatic expansion of the human brain.
The study, by Dr Thomas A. Püschel and Rachel M. Hurwitz at Oxford’s School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, with Professor Chris Venditti at the University of Reading, brought together data on 2,025 individuals across 41 species of monkeys and apes. Using Bayesian modelling that accounts for evolutionary relationships between species, the team tested the major existing hypotheses for why handedness evolved: including tool use, diet, habitat, body mass, social organisation, brain size and locomotion.
Humans sat conspicuously outside the pattern that explained every other primate, but when the researchers added two factors into the model - brain size and the relative length of our arms versus our legs (a standard anatomical marker of bipedal locomotion) - that exceptional status disappeared. In other words, once you account for upright walking and a large brain, humans stop looking like an evolutionary anomaly.
Using the same models, the team was also able to estimate likely handedness in extinct human ancestors. The picture that emerges is a gradient; early hominins such as Ardipithecus and Australopithecus probably had only mild rightward preferences, broadly similar to modern great apes. With the appearance of the genus Homo, the bias strengthens markedly - through Homo ergaster, Homo erectus and Neanderthals - reaching its modern extreme in Homo sapiens.
There is one striking exception: Homo floresiensis, the small-brained “hobbit” species from Indonesia, shows a much weaker predicted preference. The researchers suggest this fits the wider pattern: floresiensis had a small brain and a body adapted to a mix of upright walking and climbing, rather than full bipedalism.
The findings point to a two-stage story. Walking upright came first, freeing the hands from the work of locomotion and creating new selective pressure for fine, lateralised manual behaviours. Larger brains came later, and as they grew and reorganised, the rightward bias hardened into the near-universal pattern seen today.
Dr Thomas A. Püschel, Wendy James Associate Professor in Evolutionary Anthropology at the University of Oxford, said: ‘This is the first study to test several of the major hypotheses for human handedness in a single framework. Our results suggest it is probably tied to some of the key features that make us human, especially walking upright and the evolution of larger brains. By looking across many primate species, we can begin to understand which aspects of handedness are ancient and shared, and which are uniquely human.’
The study leaves open questions for future research, including the role of cumulative human culture in stabilising right-handedness, why left-handedness has persisted at all, and whether similar patterns of limb preference seen in animals such as parrots and kangaroos point to a deeper, convergent story across the wider animal kingdom.
-ENDS-
Notes to Editors
‘Bipedalism and brain expansion explain human handedness’, Püschel, T. A., Hurwitz, R. M., Venditti, C., PLOS Biology(2026).
URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003771
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003771
Images
A selection of high-res images for editorial use are available here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VbabWQ1QMdvdtGpdsqb9tFgRMq3Le-7B?usp=sharing
Media Contact
Emma Stell, Communications Officer, Social Sciences Division
E: news@anthro.ox.ac.uk
About the School of Anthropology & Museum Ethnography
The School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography at the University of Oxford is the largest anthropology department in the UK. Through our uniquely wide-ranging approach we produce internationally recognised research, and our teaching engages with all kinds of contemporary issues. Our department is highly diverse and international, with over 70% of our students taking graduate level degrees coming from outside the UK. Our work is guided by an ethos of openness, tolerance and respect for all.
About the University of Oxford
Oxford University has been placed number 1 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the tenth year running, and number 3 in the QS World Rankings 2024. At the heart of this success are the twin-pillars of our ground-breaking research and innovation and our distinctive educational offer.
Oxford is world-famous for research and teaching excellence and home to some of the most talented people from across the globe. Our work helps the lives of millions, solving real-world problems through a huge network of partnerships and collaborations. The breadth and interdisciplinary nature of our research alongside our personalised approach to teaching sparks imaginative and inventive insights and solutions.
Through its research commercialisation arm, Oxford University Innovation, Oxford is the highest university patent filer in the UK and is ranked first in the UK for university spinouts, having created more than 300 new companies since 1988. Over a third of these companies have been created in the past five years. The university is a catalyst for prosperity in Oxfordshire and the United Kingdom, contributing around £16.9 billion to the UK economy in 2021/22, and supports more than 90,400 full time jobs.
Journal
PLOS Biology