News Release

Dismantling independent science—the supreme court and public health regulation

JAMA

Peer-Reviewed Publication

JAMA Network

About the Study: This Viewpoint summarizes the ways in which federal health agencies and state-level safeguards work in parallel to ensure public health and highlights how 3 recent Supreme Court rulings have reduced the independence of federal agencies, expanded political control over them, and curtailed state-level protections meant to challenge and supplement federal standards.

Corresponding Author: Lawrence O. Gostin, JD, O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, 600 New Jersey Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001 (gostin@georgetown.edu).

10.1001/jama.2026.15473

To access the embargoed study: Visit our JAMA Network Media Center at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2026.15473?guestAccessKey=3bdea49d-5fb2-4ebe-903d-e7076f0683b7&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=081026

Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.