News Release

Reading risk behavior in the brain

Psychologists at Friedrich Schiller University Jena (Germany) can determine risk behavior from specific brain activity

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Friedrich-Schiller-Universitaet Jena

Barbara Schmidt, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitaet Jena

image: The experiments of Dr. Barbara Schmidt and the team show how to use the EEG data to predict the decisions a person will make in specific situations. view more 

Credit: Jan-Peter Kasper/FSU Jena

Jena, Germany (20.06.2018) Anxious people take fewer risks – this is not surprising. However, a team of psychologists from the German Friedrich Schiller University Jena, together with partners from Würzburg in Germany and the Canadian University of Victoria have succeeded in making this decision process visible in the brain, allowing them to pre-dict the behaviour of individuals. They conducted an experiment to measure participants’ risk behaviour while using electroencephalography (EEG) to observe their brain activity. They report on their work in the current issue of the scientific journal Psychophysiology..

“For the experiment, we used a questionnaire to select 20 high anxious and 20 low anxious participants,” explains Dr Barbara Schmidt of the University of Jena, who led the project. “During the actual experiment, the participants had to turn one of two cards in each trial of a risk game. In each trial, they could win a maximum of 11 cents. The im-portant point was that they had to decide between two risk options: a high-risk option in which they could win either 11 cents or zero cents, and a low-risk option in which the test person could win either five or six cents. The expected value of 5.5 cents was always the same.” In the experiment, high anxious participants chose the low-risk option more often.

But the key finding of the study resulted from a glance at the EEG recorded during the experiment. While the participants decided which of the two risk options they want to choose, a specific type of brain activity – Frontal Midline Theta Power – was especially high. “Previous research had already shown that this brain activity is particularly pro-nounced in anxious people, but until now we did not know what effect it had on beha¬viour,” said psychologist Schmidt. “With our study we have now been able to demonstrate that higher Frontal Midline Theta Power shows heightened cognitive control – weighing up the options more intensively – during the decision-making process.” This is a pivotal finding for behavioural research.

Possibility of predicting behaviour

Psychologists often examine correlates in the brain that indicate a certain psychological concept, but it is not always possible to draw conclusions about a person’s behaviour. “In our results, everything just fits together very well,” says Barbara Schmidt. “We have the initial psychological disposition, the appropriate brain activity that represents the decision-making process, and the resulting behaviour. The link between anxiety and the associated behaviour is therefore completely explained.”

With this knowledge, the researchers can even use the relevant EEG to predict the de-cisions a person will make in specific situations. Higher Frontal Midline Theta Power in-dicates a low-risk decision.

Barbara Schmidt would now like to use these findings in her further research. Her spe-cialist field is hypnosis. Here, too, she is investigating brain waves using EEG. “In sub-sequent studies I would like, to find out whether people take greater risks if they are told under hypnosis that they feel safe,” she explains. “The new findings on Frontal Midline Theta Power will therefore be very helpful.”


Original publication:

Barbara Schmidt, Hannah Kanis, Clay B. Holroyd, Wolfgang H. R. Miltner, Johannes Hewig (2018): Anxious Gambling: Anxiety is associated with higher frontal midline theta predicting less risky decisions, Psychophysiology, doi: 10.1111/psyp.13210


Dr Barbara Schmidt
Institute of Psychology of Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Am Steiger 3, Haus 1
07743 Jena
Phone: +49 (0)3641 / 945149

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.