image: Revenue share accounted for by the 10 largest companies in each of the eight core industries of the ocean economy. Outer band indicates the respective industry total revenue in 2018 USD. view more
Credit: Science Advances
For the first time, scientists have identified the 100 transnational corporations (see table) extracting the majority of revenues from economic use of the world's ocean.
Dubbed the "Ocean 100", the group of companies generated US$1.1 trillion in revenues in 2018, according to the research published in the journal Science Advances.
"If the Ocean 100 was a country it would be the 16th largest on Earth," said Henrik Österblom, a co-author on the study from Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University. "By revenue, the Ocean 100 is equivalent to the GDP of Mexico."
The researchers from the centre and Duke University assessed eight core ocean industries: offshore oil and gas, marine equipment and construction, seafood production and processing, container shipping, shipbuilding and repair, cruise tourism, port activities and offshore wind. Combined these industries had revenues of $1.9 trillion in 2018, the most recent year analysed. According to the study, the 100 largest companies took an estimated 60% of all revenues in these eight industries.
The Ocean 100 list is dominated by offshore oil and gas companies with a combined revenue of $830 billion. The only non-oil and gas company in the top ten is the shipping company A.P. Møller-Mærsk at No. 9.
The researchers found a consistent pattern across all eight industries. A a small number of companies account for the bulk of revenues. On average, the 10 largest companies in each industry took 45 percent of that industry's total revenue. The highest concentrations were found in cruise tourism (93 percent), container shipping (85 percent) and port activities (82 percent).
"Now that we know who has the biggest impact on the ocean this can help improve transparency relating to sustainability and ocean stewardship," said lead author John Virdin from Duke University.
"Why do such a small number of companies dominate this sector? This likely reflects high barriers to entry in the ocean economy. A lot of expertise and capital are needed to operate in the sea, both for the established industries and emerging one such as deep-sea mining and marine biotechnology," said Virdin.
The authors say that such high concentration is a risk to international goals for sustainable ocean use, but possibly also an opportunity. One risk is that a small number of companies headquartered in a few countries (by revenue, the largest companies are based in the United States, China, Saudi Arabia, France, the United Kingdom and Norway) could more easily lobby governments to weaken social or environmental rules for example to limit greenhouse gas emissions or stifle innovation. Conversely, with just a small number of companies it may be easier to coordinate action for ocean stewardship and harness private funding to support globally-agreed public initiatives in the ocean (e.g. ocean clean-ups, conservation, support for small-scale fishing communities).
One surprise in the study is the scale of offshore wind farms. This is now becoming a major sector in the ocean economy worth $37 billion in 2018 - and growing rapidly. "Since 2000, the capacity of offshore wind farms has seen a staggering 400-fold increase and this is expected to accelerate further as demand for renewable energy grows," said Jean Baptiste Jouffray, a co-author of the study from the Stockholm Resilience Centre.
The idea for the new analysis began four years back while John Virdin was providing advice for governments on the future of the ocean economy.
"The OECD had just published a report on the future of the ocean economy which included more clearly defined economic sectors. Around this time, someone handed me Henrik and Jean Baptiste's 2015 paper on keystone actors in the seafood industry. I wondered if we could apply the same keystone actor concept to the entire ocean economy using the OECD definitions," said Virdin.
The analysis did not explore the ecological impact of the Ocean 100. Future research will explore the Ocean 100 environmental footprint with a focus on carbon emissions.
###
The research contributes to UNESCO's Decade of Ocean Science (2021-2030).
Largest corporations by revenue in the ocean economy
Corporation:
- 1. Saudi Aramco
2. Petrobras
3. National Iranian Oil Company
4. Pemex
5. ExxonMobil
6. Royal Dutch Shell
7. Equinor
8. Total
9. A.P. Møller-Maersk
10. BP
11. Qatar Petroleum
12. Chevron
13. China National Offshore Oil Corporation
14. Abu Dhabi National Oil Company
15. Mediterranean Shipping Company
16. CMA CGM
17. Petoro
18. Eni S.p.A.
19. Carnival Corporation & plc
20. Petronas
21. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation
22. China State Shipbuilding Corp Ltd
23. COSCO Shipping
24. Hyundai Engineering and Construction
25. TechnipFMC
26. Hyundai Heavy Industries
27. Hapag-Lloyd
28. Ocean Network Express
29. Saipem
30. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
31. Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Equipment
32. Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation
33. General Dynamics
34. Huntington Ingalls Industries
35. State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic
36. Sonangol
37. Maruha Nichiro Corporation
38. ConocoPhillips
39. Vår Energi
40. Inpex
41. China Shipbuilding Industry Company Ltd
42. Fincantieri Group
43. PTT Exploration and Production Public Company
44. Nippon Suisan Kaisha
45. Pertamina
46. Sinopec Group
47. Wartsila
48. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings
49. DP World
50. Shanghai International Port Group
51. Evergreen Marine Corporation
52. BHP
53. Occidental Petroleum
54. Repsol
55. Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A.
56. Dongwon Enterprise
57. Wintershall Dea
58. Samsung Heavy Industries
59. Ørsted
60. Mowi
61. Yang Ming Marine Transport
62. Pacific International Lines
63. CK Hutchison Holdings
64. Naval Group
65. APM Terminals
66. Thai Union Group
67. Subsea 7
68. Perenco
69. PetroVietnam
70. Lukoil
71. BAE Systems
72. Chrysaor
73. Bahrain Petroleum Company
74. Aker BP
75. Hyundai Merchant Marine
76. Sembcorp Marine
77. Dragon-ENOC
78. Mubadala Development Company
79. Mitsubishi Corporation
80. Hitachi Zosen
81. Imabari Shipbuilding
82. Gazprom
83. Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd
84. Zim
85. MSC Cruises
86. Dredging, Environmental and Marine Engineering
87. PSA International
88. Mitsui
89. Royal Boskalis Westminster
90. OUG Holdings
91. Aker Solutions ASA
92. Neptune Energy
93. Austevoll Seafood
94. OMV
95. Hess
96. Woodside
97. Meyer Neptun
98. Suncor Energy
99. Spirit Energy
100. Trident Seafoods
Publication
CITATION: "The Ocean 100: Transnational Corporations in the Ocean Economy," J. Virdin, T. Vegh, J.B. Jouffray, R. Blasiak, S. Mason, H. Österblom, D. Vermeer, H. Wachtmeister and N. Werner. Jan. 13, 2021, Science Advances.
Paper available on request.
Graphics and table available on request.
Journal
Science Advances