News Release

Story tips from Johns Hopkins experts on COVID-19

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Johns Hopkins Medicine


Media Contact: Waun'Shae Blount,

One of the most serious consequences of the current COVID-19 pandemic has been the postponement of non-essential surgeries -- defined by the federal government's Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as "medical procedures that are not necessary to address an emergency or to preserve the health and safety of a patient."

When the CMS issued guidelines in April 2020 for medical centers nationwide to limit non-essential operations until facilities could be declared free of COVID-19, the American Academy of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery followed suit, telling its physician members to delay performing non-essential ear, nose and throat surgeries.

What was the impact? That's the question Johns Hopkins Medicine researchers attempted to answer in a recently published study comparing inpatient and outpatient surgical volumes from March 2020 through September 2020 with data from the same timeframe in 2019. A surgical volume is defined as the number of times a hospital has done a specific surgical procedure during a defined time.

A report on the findings appeared February 2020 in JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.

To conduct their study, the researchers used the healthcare performance improvement tool called Vizient. Researchers used data from 609 hospitals across the United States. Data were collected for the period March 1, 2019, through Sept. 30, 2020. Hospitals were included if they had a minimum of 20 otolaryngology cases per month pre-COVID and had reported volumes for all months in the study period.

Data came from 174 inpatient and 295 outpatient community facilities. The researchers found that in April 2020, outpatient surgical case volumes dropped to 18% compared to April 2019. Inpatient volumes dropped as well, especially in the Middle Atlantic and parts of the southern US, where volumes fell to 40% of the level in the previous year. Areas most affected corresponded with regions where the pandemic initially hit hardest. These data, the researchers say, might be used to determine how quickly institutions can resume surgeries following a future crisis.

By September 2020, the data showed that outpatient volumes climbed back to 97% and inpatient volumes improved to 99% of pre-pandemic levels. These recoveries over such a short period of time, the researchers say, indicate that providers were diligent about meeting patient care needs even when the country was still at the height of the pandemic.

"As the pandemic continues, we've noted that otolaryngology surgeries are still backlogged and this impacts the health and wellbeing of patients," says C. Matthew Stewart, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and senior author of the study. "To address this, we plan to keep monitoring trends in surgical volumes to develop helpful strategies for reducing or eliminating such backlogs during future pandemics or other crises."

Stewart is available for interviews.


Media Contact: Michael E. Newman,

In January, an international research team -- led by Johns Hopkins Medicine and in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and ImmunoScape, a U.S.-Singapore biotechnology company -- published one of the most comprehensive profiles to date of T lymphocytes (more commonly known as T cells), the immune system cells that help protect us against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The researchers felt that better defining which T cells interact with which specific portions of the virus could help accelerate the development of next-generation, more effective vaccines.

New variants of SARS-CoV-2 continue to spring up around the world, raising concerns that current vaccines -- designed to induce an immune response by recognizing spike proteins of the pandemic's original virus -- might not provide sufficient defense against a mutated strain. This could potentially make COVID-19 re-infection more likely or vaccination less effective.

To address these concerns, the same researchers who profiled the T cells responding to the original SARS-CoV-2 have done a second study, this time characterizing whether the immune cells also respond to three variant virus strains.

The team's findings, reported March 30 in the journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases, show that the T cells can get the job done.

The latest research used data generated from samples collected for the first study -- blood cells taken from 30 convalescent patients who had recovered from mild to moderate cases of COVID-19. The researchers used the data to assess how likely a specific type of T cell -- known as a CD8+ T cell (commonly called a "killer T cell" for its ability to eliminate cells that are infected with viruses) would recognize the three main SARS-CoV-2 variants that emerged in the past year in the United Kingdom (B.1.1.7), South Africa (B.1.351) and Brazil (B.1.1.248).

CD8+ T cells are covered in protein complexes called T cell receptors (TCRs) that bind to a specific protein fragment, known as an antigen, derived from a foreign body such as a virus. When this binding occurs, the T cell becomes activated and triggers an immune response against the invader. The ability of a specific TCR to recognize its target antigen defines that response.

In the earlier study assessing T cell response to the original SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent patients, the researchers tagged and identified the various types of CD8+ T cells specific for different parts of SARS-CoV-2. This enabled them to determine which of the viral antigens were targeted by the T cells.

Identifying those targeted antigens told the researchers which of the three SARS-CoV-2 variants to examine in the latest study. This time, they wanted to assess whether the genetic mutations associated with the variant strains might affect T cell recognition of the targets. What they discovered was that the specific CD8+ T cells targets from the original SARS-CoV-2 remained virtually unchanged for all three mutant strains.

This finding is good news, the researchers say, because it suggests that T cell response to these viral targets in the convalescent patients studied -- and most likely, in people who have been fully vaccinated -- will not be greatly affected by the mutations found in the variants. "Therefore, the vaccines currently being distributed worldwide should offer a reasonable measure of protection from either infection or serious disease caused by the three variant viruses and hopefully, any others that may emerge," says study lead author Andrew Redd, Ph.D., assistant professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and staff scientist at NIAID.

Redd is available for interviews.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.