To successfully combat a crop-threatening disease, it may be more important to educate growers about the effectiveness of control strategies than to emphasize the risk posed by the disease, according to new research by Alice Milne of Rothamsted Research in Harpenden, U.K., and colleagues. These findings appear in PLOS Computational Biology.
Disease-control campaigns help to combat plant pathogens that threaten to spread among crops, but are only successful if they are sufficiently well coordinated and if enough growers and other stakeholders comply. However, most mathematical models of disease control have neglected how people's opinions about disease-control strategies influence their decision to participate.
To better understand how opinions affect the success of a control campaign, Milne and colleagues coupled a mathematical model of the spread of citrus huanglongbing disease (HLB) with a model of human behavior that incorporates findings from a survey of growers. HLB threatens citrus production around the world, and can only be controlled if neighboring growers coordinate use of pesticides and other control strategies.
Analysis of the combined models' predictions highlights the importance of maintaining frequent engagement between growers and people who provide advice and support on HLB control. It also suggests that educating growers about the effectiveness of control strategies may be far more important than emphasizing how much of a risk HLB poses to crops. Many campaigns focus on disease risk, but doing so may be unnecessary and lead to loss of trust if an epidemic never actually occurs.
"This study shows the importance of cross-disciplinary approaches to tackle serious disease outbreaks," Milne says. "We used an infectious disease of citrus trees, but our results are likely applicable to serious human diseases, as well."
Next, the researchers plan to investigate other systems in which human behavior plays an important role in programs to monitor and control invasive pests or diseases. This will involve deeper exploration of stakeholder values and motivation, as well as development of new methods to represent these viewpoints in mathematical models.
Peer-reviewed; Modeling; N/A
In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Computational Biology: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007570
Citation: Milne AE, Gottwald T, Parnell SR, Alonso Chavez V, van den Bosch F (2020) What makes or breaks a campaign to stop an invading plant pathogen? PLoS Comput Biol 16(2): e1007570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007570
Funding: This research was funded by USDA, APHIS, Farm Bill Grant project 15-8130-0592-CA "Minimizing socio-political impacts to maximize cost-effective control of emerging plant pests". A. Milne and F. van den Bosch are supported by the Institute Strategic Programme Grants: Delivering Sustainable Systems BB/J/00426x/1) funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems (NEC05829 LTS-M ASSIST) funded by BBSRC and NERC, Smart Crop Protection (SCP) strategic programme (BBS/OS/CP/000001) and "Soils to Nutrition" (S2N) grant number BBS/E/C/000I0330. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
PLoS Computational Biology