News Release

Higher live birth rates found after transferring fresh rather than frozen embryos...

Live birth rates remained higher for fresh embryos even when compared to frozen embryos known to contain the normal number of chromosomes

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Brigham and Women's Hospital

BOSTON -- For women hoping to achieve a pregnancy using freshly retrieved donor eggs, a new retrospective study led by researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital may provide important insight. Brigham senior author Janis H. Fox, MD, had observed that when freshly retrieved donor eggs were used, pregnancy rates were higher for fresh compared to frozen embryo transfers. Fox and her colleagues were intrigued by this observation. The team set out to scientifically determine if this observation would be replicated in a larger sample of recipients. Leveraging national data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), the Brigham researchers found that, in cycles using freshly retrieved donor eggs, fresh embryo transfers were indeed associated with significantly higher live birth rates compared to frozen embryo transfers. The team's findings are published in JAMA.

"In cycles using one's own eggs, recent randomized controlled trials comparing pregnancy rates between fresh and frozen embryo transfers have suggested that pregnancy rates are equivalent or possibly higher following frozen embryo transfers," said corresponding author Iris Insogna, MD, MBE, a fellow in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at the Brigham. "Our study suggests the opposite in cycles using freshly retrieved donor eggs. In fresh donor egg recipients, pregnancy rates were actually higher following fresh embryo transfers compared to frozen embryo transfers."

The use of donor eggs has been steadily increasing in the United States since the first American child was born from egg donation in 1984. Since 2007, there has been a notable rise in the use of frozen rather than fresh embryo transfers in donor egg cycles. This is in part due to greater interest in preimplantation genetic testing to ensure the embryo has the correct number of chromosomes (a process that necessitates freezing the embryo while awaiting the results), and also because fresh donor embryo transfers present unique logistical challenges in that they require synchronizing the recipient's uterine lining with the egg donor's stimulation.

To determine whether fresh embryos derived from freshly retrieved donor eggs offered any benefit compared to frozen embryos, the Brigham team used data from SART, which collects cycle information from 370 in vitro fertilization clinics in the U.S., accounting for more than 95 percent of all assisted reproduction volume nationwide. The current study includes more than 33,000 recipients.

"The extensive data set that SART makes available for research and analysis is an incredibly valuable resource to answer questions such as ours," said Fox, an attending reproductive endocrinologist in the Brigham's Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery and an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School.

The team found that fresh embryos derived from fresh donor eggs were associated with significantly higher live birth and clinical pregnancy rates, while miscarriage rates were the same between both groups. For fresh embryos, the live birth rate was 56.6 percent compared to 44 percent for frozen embryos. Clinical pregnancy rates were 66.7 percent for fresh embryos compared to 54.2 percent for frozen. Interestingly, the Brigham team found that live birth rates remained higher following the transfer of fresh embryos, even when compared to the transfer of frozen embryos that had undergone preimplantation genetic testing and were known to contain the normal number of chromosomes.

The authors note this is a retrospective study so can only demonstrate associations between exposures and outcomes. Though the SART database is extensive, some information is missing, including age and demographic information of some anonymous donors included in the study.

While fresh embryos derived from fresh donor eggs conferred a statistically significant and clinically meaningful higher rate of live births compared to frozen embryos, the authors emphasize that live birth rates were high for both groups.

"The transfer of either fresh or frozen embryos derived from freshly retrieved donor eggs provides an excellent chance of achieving a pregnancy," said Insogna.

Fox adds, "For women contemplating achieving a pregnancy using freshly retrieved donor eggs, as well as for their physicians, we feel this study provides valuable guidance."


The authors report no sources of funding for this work.

Paper cited: Insogna, I et al. "Association of fresh embryo transfers compared with cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers with live birth rate among women undergoing assisted reproduction using freshly retrieved donor oocytes." JAMA DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.23718

Brigham Health, a global leader in creating a healthier world, consists of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, the Brigham and Women's Physicians Organization and many related facilities and programs. With more than 1,000 inpatient beds, approximately 60,000 inpatient stays and 1.7 million outpatient encounters annually, Brigham Health's 1,200 physicians provide expert care in virtually every medical and surgical specialty to patients locally, regionally and around the world. An international leader in basic, clinical and translational research, Brigham Health has nearly 5,000 scientists, including physician-investigators, renowned biomedical researchers and faculty supported by over $700 million in funding. The Brigham's medical preeminence dates back to 1832, and now, with 19,000 employees, that rich history is the foundation for its commitment to research, innovation, and community. Boston-based Brigham and Women's Hospital is a teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School and dedicated to educating and training the next generation of health care professionals. For more information, resources, and to follow us on social media, please visit

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.