image: Every day, thousands of people have a catheter inserted to start treatment for cancer and serious infections. But are they facing unnecessary risks? view more
Credit: Motion by Design
A world-first study led by the University of South Australia has found that cancer patients receiving chemotherapy intravenously have more than double the risk of developing a blood clot or thrombosis if the vein is too small and the catheter occupies more than 45 per cent of the vein.
The finding, published in the British Medical Journal Open, is the first time that catheter-vein ratios (CVRs) have been studied in different patient groups to determine the risk of thrombosis depending on how much the catheter obstructs blood flow.
Cancer itself (especially leukaemia and other blood cancers) and the chemotherapy used to treat it both increase thrombosis risk, and the catheters increase this risk even further if blood flow is restricted, according to Dr Rebecca Sharp, a UniSA vascular access device researcher who led the study.
“Catheters are commonly used to infuse medications or liquid nutrition, but they come with risks, particularly if the catheter is too big for the vein. Previous research has shown they can impede blood flow by up to 80 per cent,” Dr Sharp says.
Data from 2438 patients with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was analysed from four hospitals across Australia and New Zealand, identifying 39 cases of thrombosis.
“Many clinicians use a CVR of less than 33 per cent, where the catheter occupies only one third of the vein. Others adhere to a 45 per cent limit. However, there is a lack of evidence showing which CVRs are safe for individual patients. Some clinicians don’t measure veins at all.”
PICCs are commonly used internationally. They are convenient, easy to insert and cheaper than other devices such as a port (a flexible tube placed into a vein in the chest), which is invasive and requires surgery. However, PICCs are riskier, researchers say.
“We have identified how to reduce some of these risks, by recommending specific limits on catheter-to-vein ratios for individual patients. These results will help nurses and doctors to provide safe care and reduce harm for people with cancer,” Dr Sharp says.
The analysis did not find any increased risk of blood clots for non-cancer patients treated for infections via catheters.
###
A video explaining the findings can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsTqa10K9SQ
Notes for editors
“Catheter to vein ratio and risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-associated thrombosis according to diagnostic group: a retrospective cohort study” is published in the British Medical Journal Open. For a copy of the paper please email candy.gibson@unisa.edu.au
University of South Australia led the study, which also included researchers from the National University of Ireland; Griffith University, NSW; Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle; St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney; St George Hospital, Sydney; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Wellington, New Zealand; and Fiona Stanley Hospital in WA.
Journal
BMJ Open
Method of Research
Case study
Subject of Research
People
Article Title
Catheter to vein ratio and risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-associated thrombosis according to diagnostic group: a retrospective cohort study
Article Publication Date
22-Jun-2021