News Release

Surroundings affect rhythm of an individual’s walk, according to new study

Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of Bristol

Image 1

image: Nature vs. Urban Environments view more 

Credit: Prof Ute Leonards

Stepping patterns become slower and more variable if a person is uncomfortable with their surroundings, researchers have found.

Scientists at the University of Bristol have discovered that people who felt more at ease in urban environments had as regular stepping patterns as folk who felt relaxed walking in nature.

The findings, published in PLoS One, show that rather than being a quality exclusive to natural environments, the key factor of an environment is how comfortable people feel in it and that defines how beneficial it is for wellbeing. This means that a well-designed urban environment can be similarly beneficial for concentration and attention as natural surroundings.

Lead author Daria Burtan of Bristol’s School of Psychological Science said: “Measuring the changes of a person’s walking patterns through an environment allows us to understand their experienced comfort on a moment-to-moment basis.”

“This is an important step toward being able to objectively quantify the impact of particular architectural designs on people’s wellbeing.”

Scientists have previously shown that spending time in green spaces such as parks helps improve attention spans, concentration and wellbeing which can be shown by improvements in measured stepping patterns when walking in different environments.

Daria added: “As our cognitive faculties begin to decline in older age, the stepping patterns we make with our feet become slower and more variable, relative to when we are younger in the prime of our health.  We found that the same thing happened when people walked toward images of urban and nature scenes they didn’t feel comfortable with - their stepping patterns became slower and more varied, relative to when they were looking at scenes they found comfortable and which they liked. “

“Not only does this suggest that environments in which we feel comfortable and safe, place fewer processing demands on our brains; it demonstrates how measuring the real-time dynamics of our gait provides us with a powerful new tool for informing on the cognitive impacts of architecture and urban design.”

The researchers are now looking to understand which psychological factors contribute to sensory discomfort.


‘Nature benefits revisited: differences in gait kinematics between nature and urban images disappear when image types are controlled for likeability’ in PLoS by Daria Burtan, Dr J.F. Burn and Professor Ute Leonards.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.