WASHINGTON—Urban areas may be at greater risk for precipitation-triggered landslides than rural areas, according to a new study that could help improve landslide predictions and hazard and risk assessments.
Landslides cause thousands of deaths and billions of dollars of damage annually. With over half of the world’s population in urban areas, and both urbanization and precipitation extremes expected to increase in the future, understanding how urban landscapes are affected by precipitation-triggered landslides is a pressing need.
The new study used a large database of precipitation-triggered landslides across the Pacific coast of the U.S. and isolated the influence of precipitation changes using a specific type of computer model. When the researchers controlled for other factors, like slope steepness, rock type, and wildfire, they found that urban landslide hazard was up to 10 times more sensitive to variations in precipitation than in rural areas. That means that the same increase in rainfall in rural and urban areas could be 10 times more likely to cause a landslide in a city.
The new research is published in the AGU journal Geophysical Research Letters, which publishes high-impact, short-format reports with immediate implications spanning all Earth and space sciences.
“There’s a much stronger relationship between precipitation and landslide likelihood in urban versus rural areas,” said Elizabeth Johnston, a geomorphologist and lead author of the new study. “Precipitation impacts slope stability. We’re concerned about precipitation because it’s likely that it will intensify, and this intensification could lead to greater landslide hazard in some areas. But the extent to which it increases landslide hazard isn’t known.”
While the majority, 65%, of precipitation-triggered landslides in the database occurred in rural areas, when Johnston looked at the number of landslides relative to the area in which they occurred, urban areas had an outsized number of landslides.
Johnston was surprised by the strong divide. “I didn’t set out to study urban versus rural hazards, but the urbanization signal was the strongest in preliminary models,” she said. “I recognized something was there.”
The discrepancy is likely due to human-made changes to topography and vegetation loss in urban areas, which can weaken slopes and make them more prone to landslides. Quantitatively demonstrating higher landslide likelihood in urban areas can inform hazard mapping and help guide hazard-response funding.
Urbanization as a landslide predictor
Precipitation can cause landslides by percolating through soil and bedrock, which weakens slopes, and by washing material at the surface downhill. While other events, like earthquakes, can also cause landslides, precipitation-triggered landslides are the most common. Human alterations to slopes and surfaces, like making road cuts and installing retaining walls, can change how precipitation impacts a hill’s stability.
“It’s fantastic to look at it this way, comparing and contrasting how urbanized areas are impacted versus rural areas,” said Robert Emberson, a geomorphologist who was not involved in the study. He said the new study is moving the science forward in a way that addresses the need to focus hazards assessments on how people are impacted, rather than process alone.
A relationship between urbanization and precipitation-triggered landslides had been hypothesized before, but this study is the first to quantitatively support the concept in the U.S.
“I think there’s a huge value in demonstrating this high sensitivity of urban areas to rainfall triggered landslides,” said Emberson. “I don’t think we’ve seen it conclusively shown before this point. We all kind of knew this, subconsciously, that there are reasons why urban areas would be more responsive [to precipitation triggered landslides] and have higher hazard risk… Now we’re looking at as much as ten times as responsive in some [urban] areas. That’s a big difference.”
Improving hazard assessments and mitigation
The approach Johnston and her colleagues developed can improve landslide predictions by characterizing the relationship between precipitation and landslides for specific regions, rather than relying on more general models. And the new model can be used to tackle other entangled climate change driven landscape changes, like snow.
“If we assume different land-use types have the same relationship between precipitation and landslide hazard, we’re going to end up underestimating landslide hazard,” Johnston said.
The work could also prove useful in quantifying how much precipitation is needed to trigger landslides in different regions. Although different areas will have different relationships between precipitation and landslides, Johnston tested the model at different scales in California, Washington and Oregon and found that the correlation between urban land use and increased landslide hazard from precipitation generally holds.
“This informs adaptation as we are able to provide a map that shows [landslide hazard] for a particular area, where the hazard is higher versus lower, that can be used to make development decisions. I think our work is a step in that direction, certainly for this study area. I do think that in order to truly adapt to these disasters, we need more regionally-focused research like this,” said Johnston.
AGU (www.agu.org) supports 130,000 enthusiasts to experts worldwide in Earth and space sciences. Through broad and inclusive partnerships, we advance discovery and solution science that accelerate knowledge and create solutions that are ethical, unbiased and respectful of communities and their values. Our programs include serving as a scholarly publisher, convening virtual and in-person events and providing career support. We live our values in everything we do, such as our net zero energy renovated building in Washington, D.C. and our Ethics and Equity Center, which fosters a diverse and inclusive geoscience community to ensure responsible conduct.
Notes for Journalists:
This research study will be freely available for 30 days. Download a PDF copy of the paper here. Neither the paper nor this press release is under embargo.
“Quantifying the Effect of Precipitation on Landslide Hazard in Urbanized and Non-Urbanized areas”
- Elizabeth C. Johnston, (corresponding author), Frances V. Davenport, Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Lijing Wang, Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Jef K. Caers, Department of Geological Sciences and Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Suresh Muthukrishnan, Department of Earth, Environmental, and Sustainability Sciences and GIS and Remote Sensing Center, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA
- Marshall Burke, Department of Earth System Science and Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA and Environment and Energy Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Noah S. Diffenbaugh, Department of Earth System Science and Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Geophysical Research Letters
Quantifying the Effect of Precipitation on Landslide Hazard in Urbanized and Non-Urbanized Areas
Article Publication Date