News Release

Study reveals brain networks enabling human conversation

Peer-Reviewed Publication

NYU Langone Health / NYU Grossman School of Medicine

A new study has identified a brain circuit that is active while we plan our spoken replies during conversation.

Published online January 5 in the journal Nature, the study focused on brain computations that enable such replies, which are planned before the end of a conversation partner’s turn and uttered within a fraction of a second.  

Led by researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine and the University of Iowa, the study found that distinct brain areas are active during speech planning for split-second verbal exchanges, including regions not previously linked to this function.

“Our study pinpoints brain networks behind the planning that makes this back and forth possible, which have been elusive until now,” says senior author Michael Long, PhD, the Thomas and Suzanne Murphy Professor of Neuroscience and Physiology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

He adds that “the work promises to guide the design of new therapies for the 7.5 million Americans who have trouble using their voices, including those with apraxia, trouble planning speech movements, and aphasia, difficulty processing language, which can accompany conditions like autism or result from trauma caused by a stroke.”

Three-Part Process

For years, researchers tried to link speech functions to brain circuits using electroencephalograms or EEG, which places electrodes on the scalp. Such devices measure quick swings in electrical signals seen as large groups of nerve cells “fire” to transmit electrical signals. But EEG could not pinpoint the location of nerve circuits with enough resolution, and functional magnetic resonance - another commonly used technology - was not fast enough to capture activity patterns related to the conversational planning of replies, say the study authors. These non-invasive methods leave a critical blind spot in the field’s ability to track what the brain does during everyday conversation, say the authors.

Another technology, electrocorticography (ECoG), overcomes these barriers by placing electrodes not on the scalp, but directly on surface of the brain. Fast, precise ECoG measurements revealed that the brain achieves natural conversation by combining perception of what is heard, the planning of a reply, and production of the sounds (articulation) that make up words. While other ECoG studies have determined the networks related to perception and production, the current study is the first to capture brain activity during the reply planning phase between them, which has been the hardest to study, say the authors.

“Researchers can talk to patients and watch the activity of brain circuits as they talk or listen, but planning has no physical correlate,” says Long. “When we combined ECoG measures with a technique that asks patients structured questions, we exposed an underlying planning network.”

To conduct the study, the research team placed electrodes on the brain surfaces of patients during surgeries that were underway to remove either a tumor or brain tissue causing epileptic seizures. In both cases, surgeons place patients under only local anesthesia initially so they can determine the brain regions that are active as patients talk, thus averting damage to the patient’s speech centers.

Researchers placed arrays of ECoG electrodes on the language-dominant left brain hemispheres of eight patient volunteers. Next, they measured planning responses using a paradigm developed by another lab called a critical information (CI) task, which was designed to control the timing of planning. In each block of questions, a changing keyword, the CI, determines the when reply planning starts so brain activity can be tracked in that time window

  • The opposite of soft is what common word?
  • The opposite of hot is what common word?

By changing each question’s wording to present earlier or later key information needed to start the planning of an answer – the researchers were able to distinguish brain activity related to planning from perception and production. Importantly, the majority of cortical responses were related to only one of these three speech processes, showing that the networks were largely separate for each function.

In addition, the researchers found that 95.5 percent of planning electrodes were clustered in a spatially distinct region of the brain, with most planning electrodes centered in caudal inferior frontal gyrus (cIFG) and the caudal middle frontal gyrus (cMFG). While cIFG, commonly known as “Broca’s region,” has long been known to be important for language, a role for cMFG had not been previously been established.

Furthermore, the team found that the planning network identified with the CI task is also active when patients are preparing to speak during natural, unscripted conversations. After patients finished answering the structured questions, researchers engaged them in several minutes of casual back-and-forth conversation, during which the same patterns related to perception, planning and speaking appeared in the patient’s brain activity.

“This study provides a first description of the specific brain mechanisms that generate language as we speak in natural, every day contexts,” says Gregg Castellucci, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in Long’s lab. “Crucially, the brain mapping we found using simple, controlled tasks held up in tests of natural human behavior,” he added.

Along with Long and Castellucci, study authors were Christopher Kovach, Matthew Howard III, and Jeremy Greenlee, of the Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Iowa. Funding was provided by National Institute of Health grants R01 NS113071 and R01 DC015260, as well as by the Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.