Nutrition counseling and strictly limiting salt intake for one year in patients with heart failure resulted in improved quality of life and a slowing in the progression of the disease, but a study presented at the American College of Cardiology’s (ACC) 71st Annual Scientific Session found reducing salt intake did not significantly reduce major adverse events or hospitalizations.
The SODIUM-HF trial, which is the largest and longest randomized clinical trial to study dietary sodium reduction for heart failure, did not meet its primary endpoint—a composite of all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalizations or emergency department visits. However, researchers said the improvements seen in secondary outcomes suggest that limiting sodium intake could be helpful for some patients.
“While the intervention didn’t reduce clinical events, we found the low-sodium group had modest improvements in quality of life and New York Heart Association heart failure class, which we think will be quite important and valued by patients and clinicians alike,” said Justin A. Ezekowitz, MBBCh, professor of medicine at the University of Alberta, Edmonton in Canada, and the study’s lead author. “We need to explore further whether there might be a way to individualize recommendations from our trial to see if the quality-of-life benefits might make it worth it for certain patients [to reduce sodium intake].”
Heart failure is a chronic condition in which the heart muscle becomes too weak to pump blood effectively. Some medical therapies can help slow heart failure progression, but many patients continue to experience a worsening quality of life with symptoms such as swelling, fatigue and coughing, along with a high risk of hospitalization and other cardiovascular problems. Although patients with heart failure have traditionally been advised to limit the amount of salt in their diets, to date there has been limited scientific evidence to back up this advice.
For the study, researchers enrolled 841 patients treated for heart failure at 26 medical centers in six countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Colombia and Chile). Patients had a median ejection fraction of 36%—a reflection of the amount of blood the heart pushes out with each contraction—indicating that most participants had the type of heart failure caused by limited squeezing strength (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), rather than the heart’s ventricle filling with a lower-than-normal amount of blood (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction). Patients with both types of heart failure were included in the study.
Half of the study participants were randomly assigned to receive usual care while half received nutritional counseling tailored to their dietary patterns, including menus reflecting locally available foods. Researchers calculated each participant’s average daily sodium intake based on frequent three-day food questionnaires throughout the study.
The nutritional intervention was aimed at helping participants reduce their sodium intake to 1,500 milligrams (mg) per day, equivalent to about two-thirds of a teaspoon of table salt. Before the study, patients consumed a median of 2,217 mg of sodium daily, equivalent to just under one teaspoon of table salt. After one year, participants in the usual care group consumed a median of 2,072 mg of sodium daily while those who received the nutritional intervention consumed a median of 1,658 mg—a reduction of 414 mg of sodium, or a bit less than a quarter teaspoon of table salt per day.
At the end of the year-long study, researchers compared rates of death from any cause, cardiovascular hospitalization and cardiovascular emergency department visits in the two study groups, the study’s primary endpoint. The total number of these events was numerically lower in the group receiving the nutritional intervention, but this difference was not statistically significant, even after adjusting for slight differences in the baseline demographic and health-related differences between the two groups.
Secondary analyses revealed significant improvements in quality of life, assessed using three different validated quality of life assessment tools, in the group receiving nutritional counseling.
“All three scores were significantly better in the low-sodium group compared to the usual care group, and these improvements in quality-of-life scores were consistent across all the assessments and across time,” said Ezekowitz, who is also director of cardiovascular research at the University of Alberta and co-director of the Canadian VIGOUR Center. “This improvement was quite marked compared to other clinical trials, for example, trials for pharmacological interventions.”
Patients receiving the intervention also had a better New York Heart Association heart failure class—a measure of heart failure severity—than those receiving usual care. There was no statistically significant difference in the distance patients were able to walk in six minutes, although there was a trend toward longer walking times among those who received the intervention.
Ezekowitz said that the two study groups showed no significant changes in terms of body weight during the study, but additional analyses are underway to assess participants’ dietary intake for nutrients or dietary components other than sodium. He added that further study would be needed to determine whether a more drastic reduction in sodium intake might have a greater impact on health outcomes or whether certain subgroups of patients might derive greater benefits based on the severity of their disease and quality of life. A longer follow-up period could also potentially reveal longer-term differences in clinical outcomes. The researchers plan to continue the study and assess outcomes at 24 months.
Current dietary guidelines in the U.S., including the 2019 ACC/American Heart Association Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, recommend limiting sodium but do not specify a target daily amount. Guidelines in the U.S. and Europe previously recommended limiting dietary sodium intake to 2,400 mg per day.
This study was simultaneously published online in The Lancet at the time of presentation. The study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the University Hospital Foundation and The Health Research Council of New Zealand.
Ezekowitz will be available to the media in a press conference on Saturday, April 2, at 11:00 a.m. ET / 15:00 UTC in Room 103AB.
Ezekowitz will present the study, “SODIUM-HF: Study of Dietary Intervention Under 100 Mmol in Heart Failure,” on Saturday, April 2, at 9:30 a.m. ET / 13:30 UTC in the Main Tent, Hall D.
ACC.22 will take place April 2-4, 2022, in Washington, DC, bringing together cardiologists and cardiovascular specialists from around the world to share the newest discoveries in treatment and prevention. Follow @ACCinTouch, @ACCMediaCenter and #ACC22 for the latest news from the meeting.
The American College of Cardiology envisions a world where innovation and knowledge optimize cardiovascular care and outcomes. As the professional home for the entire cardiovascular care team, the mission of the College and its 54,000 members is to transform cardiovascular care and to improve heart health. The ACC bestows credentials upon cardiovascular professionals who meet stringent qualifications and leads in the formation of health policy, standards and guidelines. The College also provides professional medical education, disseminates cardiovascular research through its world-renowned JACC Journals, operates national registries to measure and improve care, and offers cardiovascular accreditation to hospitals and institutions. For more, visit ACC.org.
Method of Research
Randomized controlled/clinical trial
Subject of Research
Reduction of dietary sodium to less than 100 mmol in heart failure (SODIUM-HF): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial
Article Publication Date