News Release

Haitian Revolution shows that human rights do not protect against inequality

Reports and Proceedings

University of Gothenburg

Analysing the Haitian Revolution offers new perspectives on our times. Research from the
University of Gothenburg shows that it was during this revolution that the relationship between
political rights and inequality first came to a head, as reflected in contemporary global
developments
.

The origins of human rights and democracy have previously been traced back to historical events
such as the American and French revolutions. More recently, researchers and social commentators
have instead pointed to the Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) as the breeding ground for these ideas
and institutions.

The revolution took place during the same period as the American and French revolutions. However,
it has attracted much less attention, despite being the only successful slave revolution in history.
In his thesis, Carl Wilén examines the significance of the Haitian Revolution for the development of
human rights.

“More recent interpretations argue that because slavery was abolished for the first time in the
Haitian Revolution, this is the revolution that we need to examine in order to understand
phenomena such as human rights and the origins of democracy,” he explains.

Human rights and inequality are not incompatible
It was in the early 1990s that the significance of the Haitian Revolution in terms of human rights and
democracy was first studied and discussed seriously within academia and politics. Carl has mapped
the debate, which can largely be divided into two camps.

One side believes that the revolution laid the foundations for the modern-day notion of rights that
apply to all people. The other side points out that authoritarian and unequal labour legislation was
introduced during the revolution, which cannot be said to form the basis for human rights.

Carl offers a new interpretation that combines the two approaches.

“Our own era was born in the context of the Haitian Revolution – not because it implemented
human rights, but because it abolished a system in which social and political inequality were one and
the same thing. The society that was born then is characterised by both political equality and
socioeconomic inequality. Socioeconomic inequality can be extreme; it is today, and it was then,
too.”

By analysing events during and after the Haitian Revolution, Carl aims to contribute towards a better
understanding of our times. Over the course of the last four decades, human rights have broadened
to include more people than ever before. During the same period, global trends have reversed, from
growing socioeconomic equality towards greater inequality.

“There are problematic assumptions about how to describe the relationship between rights and
socioeconomic inequality. It has been assumed, rather than proven, that the two sides of this
relationship are incompatible.”

Our ideas about rights are influenced by where we think they come from
Carl argues that it is important to know where our ideas about rights come from and what their
historical function has been, since these perceptions influence how we view rights today and what
we imagine they can do.

“We must address the question of how human rights relate to socioeconomic inequality and not
assume that they are incompatible. A human rights policy may even contribute towards deepening
inequality by not being a good and effective weapon against such a trend.”

The thesis Interpreting the Haitian Revolution: From the Rights of Man to Human Rights will be made available through an international publisher.

A summary and table of contents are digitally available.

For more information: Carl Wilén, telephone: +46 73 508 80 73, email: carl.wilen@gmail.com


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.