News Release

How an urban bat differs from a rural bat

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW)

Pipistrelle bat

image: Pipistrelle bat; Christian Giese/Leibniz-IZW view more 

Credit: Christian Giese

Press Release // Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (Leibniz-IZW), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) & Freie Universität Berlin 
Date: August 11, 2022

Some bat species are more likely to be found in cities than in the countryside. A scientific team from Freie Universität Berlin, the University of Greifswald, the Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) and the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (Leibniz-IZW) now investigated which characteristics are typical for urban and rural bats. The team found that bat species with higher affinity to cities are characterised by relatively low frequencies and long durations of their echolocation calls, a small body size and flexibility in the choice of their daytime roost. The increasing urbanisation of rural areas could favour these species, while relatively large species with high calling frequencies and short calling durations, as well as a specific roost choice could fall behind, the team argues in a paper in the journal “Global Change Biology”.

For many wild animals, cities represent extreme habitats – with higher ambient temperatures than in the immediate surroundings and a variety of disturbances caused by humans. At the same time, cities also offer a lot of potential for wildlife, such as a diverse range of roosting opportunities and an expanded food supply. For example, some bat species prefer to use roosts on or in buildings, finding a place to rest in unused attics, in cellars or in derelict houses. Some bat species reach particularly high population densities in cities, whereas they are rather rare in rural areas. But what makes an urban bat an urban bat, and a rural bat a rural bat? In which traits do urban species differ from rural species? 

“Using various indices, we analysed a global database of bat species occurrence data in terms of their spatial proximity to urban areas to derive an urban affinity value per species,” explains lead author Janis Wolf, a doctoral candidate at the University of Greifswald, whose MSc thesis in the research group of Prof. Jonathan Jeschke at the Freie Uiversität Berlin and IGB formed the basis of this publication. “We used various indicators to differentiate species who tend to live in urban areas from those who tend to avoid them. We then analysed which characteristics or traits of the species – for example average body size, wing shape, frequency of their echolocation calls or the flexibility in the choice of roost – correlated with the respective spatial preference and way of life.”

Based on the traits and spatial data of 356 bat species worldwide (a quarter of the 1,400 bat species on our planet), the team determined whether the respective species tended to have a distribution focus on urban or rural areas. “Of course, most bat species are positioned along a continuum that distinguishes urban-dwelling bat species from those that tended to live in rural areas,” explains PD Dr Christian Voigt, head of the Department of Evolutionary Ecology at Leibniz-IZW. “We found that especially small bat species, and those with echolocation calls of a relatively low frequency and long duration, which are suitable for foraging in relatively open spaces, are particularly likely to reside in cities,” says Voigt. Flexibility in the choice of the day roost seems to be equally advantageous, as this allows urban-dwelling bats to switch between roosts at short notice when disturbed by humans.

During their study, the team used different proxies for describing the affinity of bats for urban environments. “Having tested multiple methodological approaches to quantify urban affinity of species, we found that the simpler indices were as good as the more complex indices, and therefore more practical and a preferred choice for future studies,” concludes Dr Yuval Itescu from IGB and Freie Universität Berlin. This now makes it possible to apply the appropriate indices for urban affinity to other animal groups. The authors argue that identifying traits that characterise successful and less successful urban dwellers may be useful in identifying those species that are more threatened by the rapidly advancing urbanisation process worldwide, and ultimately allow to prioritise these species with regard to conservation measures.


Wolf JM, Jeschke JM, Voigt CC, Itescu, Y (2022): Urban affinity and its associated traits: a global analysis of bats. Global Change Biology[JJ1]


Freie Universität Berlin
Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3, 14195 Berlin

Janis Wolf


Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB)
in the Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V.
Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin

Dr Yuval Itescu

Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (Leibniz-IZW) 
in the Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V. 
Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany

PD Dr Christian Voigt
Head of the Department of Evolutionary Ecology
phone: +49(0)30 5168 511

Steven Seet
Head of Science Communication
phone: +49(0)30 5168125




Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.