Four of 10 Americans surveyed report that they were often less than truthful about whether they had COVID-19 and/or didn’t comply with many of the disease’s preventive measures during the height of the pandemic, according to a new nationwide study led in part by University of Utah Health scientists. The most common reasons were wanting to feel normal and exercise personal freedom.
The study, which appears in the Oct. 10, 2022, issue of JAMA Network Open, raises concerns about how reluctance to accurately report health status and adherence to masking, social distancing, and other public health measures could potentially lengthen the current COVID-19 pandemic or promote the spread of other infectious diseases in the future, according to Angela Fagerlin, Ph.D., senior author of the study and chair of the Department of Population Health Sciences at U of U Health.
“COVID-19 safety measures can certainly be burdensome, but they work,” says Andrea Gurmankin Levy, Ph.D., a professor of social sciences at Middlesex Community College in Connecticut. As co-lead author of the study, she worked in collaboration with Fagerlin and other scientists at U of U Heath as well as researchers elsewhere in the United States.
“When people are dishonest about their COVID-19 status or what precautions they are taking, it can increase the spread of disease in their community.” Levy says. “For some people, particularly before we had COVID vaccines, that can mean death.”
The researchers decided to assess how truthful Americans were being about their COVID-19 disease status and/or compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures after they noticed several media stories about people who were dishonest about their vaccination status, Fagerlin says.
In the survey, conducted in December 2021, more than 1,700 people from across the country were asked to reveal whether they had ever misrepresented their COVID-19 status, vaccination status, or told others that they were following public health measures when they actually weren’t. The sample size is far larger and asked about a broader range of behaviors than previous studies on this topic, according to Fagerlin, who is also a research scientist at the Veteran Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System.
Screening questions allowed the health service researchers and psychologists who designed the study to evenly divide the participants: one-third who had had COVID-19, one-third who had not had COVID-19 and were vaccinated, and one-third who had not had COVID-19 and were unvaccinated.
Based on a list of nine behaviors, 721 respondents (42%) reported that they had misrepresented COVID-19 status or failed to follow public health recommendations. Some of the most common incidents were:
- Breaking quarantine rules
- Telling someone they were with, or were about to see, that they were taking more COVID-19 precautions than they actually were
- Not mentioning that they might have had, or knew that they had, COVID-19 when entering a doctor’s office
- Telling someone they were vaccinated when they weren’t
- Saying they weren’t vaccinated when they actually were
All age groups younger than 60 years and those who had a greater distrust of science were more likely to engage in misrepresentation and/or misrepresentation than others. About 60% of respondents said that they had sought a doctor’s advice for COVID-19 prevention or treatment.
However, the researchers found no association between COVID-19 misrepresentation and political beliefs, political party affiliation, or religion.
“Some individuals may think if they fib about their COVID-19 status once or twice, it’s not a big deal,” Fagerlin says. “But if, as our study suggests, nearly half of us are doing it, that’s a significant problem that contributes to prolonging the pandemic.”
Among the reasons respondents gave for misrepresentation were:
- I didn’t think COVID-19 was real, or it was no big deal
- It’s no one else’s business
- I didn’t feel sick
- I was following the advice of a celebrity or other public figure
- I couldn’t miss work to stay home
Among the study’s limitations, the researchers could not determine if respondents honestly answered survey questions, opening the possibility that their findings underestimated how commonly people misrepresented their health status.
“This study goes a long way toward showing us what concerns people have about the public health measures implemented in response to the pandemic and how likely they are to be honest in the face of a global crisis,” says Alistair Thorpe, Ph.D., co-first author and a post-doctoral researcher in the Department of Population Health Sciences at U of U Health. “Knowing that will help us better prepare for the next wave of worldwide illness.”
In addition to Fagerlin and Thorpe, University of Utah Health researchers Holly Shoemaker, Frank A. Drews, Jorie M. Butler, and Vanessa Stevens contributed to this study. Other participating institutions include Middlesex Community College in Middletown, Connecticut; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; Veterans Affairs Denver Center for Innovation; University of Iowa School of Medicine, Iowa City; Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation; VA Salt Lake City Health Care System; and the American Heart Association.
The study, “Misrepresentation and Nonadherence Regarding COVID-19 Public Health Measures,” appears in the Oct. 10, 2022, issue of JAMA Network Open. It was supported by the Jon M. Huntsman Presidential Endowment and an American Heart Association Children’s Strategically Focused Research Network Fellowship.
JAMA Network Open
Method of Research
Subject of Research
Misrepresentation and Non-adherence Regarding COVID-19 Public Health Measures
Article Publication Date
Dr L. D. Scherer reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, and the Veterans Health Administration outside the submittedwork. Dr A. M. Scherer reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging outside the submitted work. Dr Butler reported receiving grants from Veterans Affairs (VA) Salt Lake City and salary support from the University of Utah during the conduct of the study and consulting fees from the University of California, San Francisco, related to geriatrics informatics outside the submitted work. Dr Stevens reported receiving grants from the VA Health Services Research and Development Service and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the conduct of the study. Dr Fagerlin reported receiving endowed chair funds from University of Utah during the conduct of the study and grants from the American Heart Association, National Institutes of Health, Doris Duke Clinical Foundation, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthwell Foundation, and VA Funds for research on COVD-19 behaviors and attitudes outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.