News Release

Humans vs. Bacteria: Differences in ribosome decoding revealed

Peer-Reviewed Publication

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Humans vs. Bacteria: Differences in Ribosome Decoding Revealed

image: (L to R) Emily Rundlet, PhD, Mikael Holm, PhD, Scott Blanchard, PhD, Roger Altman, Kundhavai Natchiar, and Zoe Watson, PhD, of the Blanchard Lab in the St. Jude Single-Molecule Imaging Center which played a key role in their investigation into how ribosomes decode mRNA. view more 

Credit: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Memphis, Tenn.—April 5, 2023) Scientists at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital revealed that human ribosomes decode messenger RNA (mRNA) 10 times slower than bacterial ribosomes, but do so more accurately. The study, published today in Nature, used a combination of field-leading structural biology approaches to better understand how ribosomes work. The scientists pinpointed where the process slows down in humans, which will be useful information for developing new therapeutics for cancer and infections.   

Ribosomes are molecular machines within cells, responsible for synthesizing proteins by decoding mRNA. By conducting mechanistic studies on bacterial and human ribosomes, researchers can understand their similarities and differences to develop drugs and understand disease. Many antibiotics, the drugs we use to treat bacterial infections, work by targeting bacterial ribosomes. In humans, changes in how accurately ribosomes decode mRNA have been linked to aging and disease, representing a potential point of therapeutic intervention. This gives the work implications for the treatment of infections and cancer.  

 

“Bacteria have been very well studied for many decades, but the kind of studies that we do, careful mechanistic studies, have been missing on human ribosomes,” said corresponding author Scott Blanchard, Ph.D., St. Jude Department of Structural Biology. “We're very interested in human ribosomes because those are what need to be targeted to find new treatments for cancer and viral infections such as COVID.” 

 

Resolution revolution 

 

Ribosomes decode mRNA using a molecule called aminoacyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) as substrate. The decoding process involves several different steps. 

 

The researchers deployed methods such as single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to examine the human ribosome decoding mechanisms. The single-molecule imaging gives the researchers information on how quickly things occur. So, in this case, how quickly human ribosomes go through the different steps during the decoding process. Cryo-EM gives the researchers structural information. So, how the human ribosome looks or what conformations (shapes) it is in at each step. By combining these two methods, the scientists get information on how quickly these processes occur in humans compared to bacteria as well as about the underlying structural causes for any differences they observe. 

 

“We wanted to know how quickly a human ribosome can read the genetic code, how quickly it finds the tRNA that’s complementary to the mRNA,” said co-first author Mikael Holm, Ph.D., St. Jude Department of Structural Biology. “We found that the process is about 10 times slower for human ribosomes than it is in bacteria. But this slow down adds accuracy, because human ribosomes are known to be more accurate at translating the code than bacterial ribosomes.” 

  

Specifically, the researchers found that while humans and bacteria both decode mRNA, the reaction pathway of aminoacyl-tRNA movement during the decoding process is different on human ribosomes and is significantly slower. These differences arise from structural elements in the human ribosome and in the human elongation factor, eEF1A, that together are responsible for faithfully incorporating the right tRNA for each mRNA codon (piece of the sequence). The distinct nature and timing of conformational changes within the ribosome and eEF1A may explain how human ribosomes achieve greater decoding accuracy.  

“With our cryo-EM structural studies, we were able to resolve human ribosome structures to atomic resolution, which revealed unprecedented features such as rRNA and protein modifications, ions and solvent molecules present in the human ribosome,” said co-first author Kundhavai Natchiar, Ph.D., St. Jude Department of Structural Biology. “These features finely characterize the molecular basis of interactions of the drug molecules with the human ribosome, which is indispensable for human ribosome–based drug design and discovery.” 

Caught in the act 

The researchers also pinpointed exactly which step of the decoding process slowed down in human ribosomes. There are two steps in the process of the ribosome selecting the right tRNA: initial selection and proofreading selection. The second step, proofreading selection, is where the ribosome checks for a second time that it chose the right molecule. That is the step that is 10 times slower in humans than in bacteria.  

 

Think of a gymnast, contorting themselves into different shapes on the mat as they work through their routine. This is similar to how ribosomes transition into various conformations to achieve different results. The research showed that a lot of conformational gymnastics that human ribosomes undergo are not present in bacterial ribosomes and are thus likely tied to the slowdown of the proofreading selection process.  

 

The researchers also found that several drugs target the proofreading selection process, not initial selection. So, instead of hitting the step that is similar between humans and bacteria, these drugs focus on the most different, slowest step. 

 

“In structural biology, a single snapshot of a macromolecular machine is not always sufficient to explain how it functions,” said co-first author Emily Rundlet, Ph.D., St. Jude Department of Structural Biology. “Often, the snapshot that’s needed to answer your biological question is not the most stable form of the molecule, but instead it is short-lived and difficult to capture. Using smFRET and cryo-EM together brings the dimension of time to structural biology, which allows us to visualize important transient intermediate steps of human decoding and understand the different mechanisms on a new level.” 

 

Authors and funding 

The study’s other authors are Hao-Yuan Wang and Jack Taunton, University of California San Francisco; and Alexander Myasnikov, Zoe Watson and Roger Altman of St. Jude. 

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM079238, GM115327), the Center for Genomic Information Encoded by RNA Nucleotide Modifications (1RM1HG011563), the Swedish Research Council (2017-06313), the National Science Foundation Center for Genetically Encoded Materials (CHE-2002182), UCSF Invent Fund, the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (28FT-0014) and ALSAC, the fundraising and awareness organization of St. Jude.  

St. Jude Media Relations Contacts 

 

Chelsea Bryant  
Desk: (901) 595-0564 
Cell: (256) 244-2048 
chelsea.bryant@stjude.org 
media@stjude.org 

 

Emily Gest  

Desk: (901) 595-0260  

Cell: (901) 568-9869  

emily.gest@stjude.org  

media@stjude.org  

  

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital is leading the way the world understands, treats and cures childhood cancer, sickle cell disease and other life-threatening disorders. It is the only National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center devoted solely to children. Treatments developed at St. Jude have helped push the overall childhood cancer survival rate from 20% to 80% since the hospital opened 60 years ago. St. Jude freely shares the breakthroughs it makes, and every child saved at St. Jude means doctors and scientists worldwide can use that knowledge to save thousands more children. Families never receive a bill from St. Jude for treatment, travel, housing and food — so families can focus on helping their child live. To learn more, visit stjude.org or follow St. Jude on social media at @stjuderesearch


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.