News Release

Scientists present evidence for a billion-years arms race between viruses and their hosts

Findings add to our understanding of the deep evolutionary history of the highly diverse Bamfordvirae kingdom of viruses

Peer-Reviewed Publication

eLife

Researchers have proposed a new evolutionary model for the origin of a kingdom of viruses called Bamfordvirae, suggesting a billion-years evolutionary arms race between two groups within this kingdom and their hosts.

Their study, published today as a Reviewed Preprint in eLife, provides what the editors say are convincing analyses that advance our understanding of the deep evolutionary history of viruses, the interaction between viruses and the first eukaryotes (organisms with cells that include a nucleus), and the diversification of viral lineages.

Viruses in the kingdom Bamfordvirae make up one of the most diverse groups that infect living organisms. They include the Nucleocytoplasmic Large DNA viruses (NCLDVs; the largest viruses characterised to date), virophages (viral parasites of other viruses), adenoviruses (common viruses that cause cold and flu-like symptoms), and Mavericks and Polinton-like viruses (both virus-like mobile genetic elements that colonise the genomes of their hosts).

There are two main hypotheses for the origins of these viruses: the ‘nuclear-escape’ and ‘virophage-first’ hypotheses. The nuclear-escape hypothesis says that a Maverick-like ancestor originated with hosts (endogenous), escaped from the host cell nucleus and gave rise to adenoviruses and NCLDVs. In contrast, the virophage-first hypothesis suggests that NCLDVs co-evolved with early virophages. Mavericks then evolved from virophages that became endogenous, with adenoviruses escaping from the host nucleus at a later stage.

“Despite these proposed scenarios, the diversification of viruses in the Bamfordvirae kingdom remains a major open question in virus evolution. To gain a better understanding of their history, we wanted to test the predictions made by both the nuclear-escape and virophage-first models, and consider alternative scenarios regarding the origin of different lineages,” says José Gabriel Niño Barreat, Postdoctoral Research Assistant at the University of Oxford, UK. Barreat is a co-author of the study alongside Aris Katzourakis, Professor of Evolution and Genomics at the University of Oxford’s Department of Biology.

Barreat and Katzourakis used two hypothesis-testing methods (maximum-likelihood and Bayesian frameworks) to compare the plausibility of the nuclear-escape versus alternative evolutionary scenarios. They focused on four key proteins shared by viruses in this lineage which are involved in the formation of viral capsids: major and minor capsid proteins, DNA-packaging ATPase, and protease. They applied another two methods that use genetic data to estimate rooted phylogenies, to infer the evolutionary trajectory of the different lineages. Then, they assessed whether adenoviruses and NCLDVs descended from a common ancestor, as predicted by the nuclear-escape scenario.

Their analyses revealed strong evidence against a sister relationship between adenoviruses and NCLDVs, as suggested by the nuclear-escape hypothesis. Instead, the findings suggest that adenoviruses descended from a common ancestor with Mavericks, to the exclusion of NCLDVs. At odds with a virophage-first scenario, the researchers found that the most recent common ancestor of Mavericks and adenoviruses was not a virophage. However, their work does not rule out the virophage-first hypothesis completely, making it the one best supported by current phylogenetic analyses.

Additionally, their work provides support for the positioning of the Bamfordvirae ancestral root between virophages and the other viral lineages. This positioning pointed the team towards a new model for the evolutionary origins of these viruses.

“The model proposes that the Bamfordvirae ancestor did not originate from an invasion of the eukaryotic cell nucleus, and that it was a non-virophage DNA virus with a small genome,” says co-author Aris Katzourakis. “The lifestyle of virophages would have evolved at a later stage as these became specialised parasites of the ancestral NCLDVs.” Katzourakis adds that the relative timing of events suggests the most recent common ancestor of the Bamfordvirae kingdom existed more than a billion years ago, extending to the initial stages of eukaryotic life. However, an absolute timescale for the precise dating of these events is not currently available.

Another limitation of the study is that the phylogenetic signal in the protein data analysed may have been obscured by the deep divergences and extreme diversity in this lineage. However, the authors were able to robustly distinguish between alternative scenarios, and the focus on the origin and development of the viral capsid provides a simple way to explain the available data.

“This work contributes to our knowledge on how viruses evolve different evolutionary strategies, for example to become parasites of other viruses like virophages, or viral giants like NCLDVs,” Barreat says. “As well as playing important roles in Earth's ecosystems, it is becoming increasingly clear that viruses may have contributed to major evolutionary transitions during the history of life. Therefore, understanding the deep evolutionary history of viruses provides more context for these ancient interactions and the actors involved.”

“Unravelling the interactions between viruses and their hosts provides a window into the deep evolutionary past that is illuminating the origins of both of these biological entities,” Katzourakis concludes.

##

Reference

The Reviewed Preprint, ‘A billion years arms-race between viruses, virophages and eukaryotes’, is available to view at https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86617.1. Contents, including text, figures and data, are free to reuse under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Author contact

Aris Katzourakis (co-author), Professor of Evolution and Genomics
University of Oxford’s Department of Biology
aris.katzourakis@biology.ox.ac.uk
+44 (0)1865 281847

Media contacts

Emily Packer, Media Relations Manager
eLife
e.packer@elifesciences.org
+44 (0)1223 855373

George Litchfield, Marketing and PR Assistant
eLife
g.litchfield@elifesciences.org

About eLife

eLife transforms research communication to create a future where a diverse, global community of scientists and researchers produces open and trusted results for the benefit of all. Independent, not-for-profit and supported by funders, we improve the way science is practised and shared. In support of our goal, we’ve launched a new publishing model that ends the accept/reject decision after peer review. Instead, papers invited for review will be published as a Reviewed Preprint that contains public peer reviews and an eLife assessment. We also continue to publish research that was accepted after peer review as part of our traditional process. eLife receives financial support and strategic guidance from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Max Planck Society and Wellcome. Learn more at https://elifesciences.org/about.

To read the latest Evolutionary Biology research published in eLife, visit https://elifesciences.org/subjects/evolutionary-biology.

And for the latest in Microbiology and Infectious Disease, see https://elifesciences.org/subjects/microbiology-infectious-disease.

About the University of Oxford

Oxford University has been placed number 1 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the seventh year running, and ‚Äčnumber 2 in the QS World Rankings 2022. At the heart of this success are the twin-pillars of our ground-breaking research and innovation and our distinctive educational offer.

Oxford is world-famous for research and teaching excellence and home to some of the most talented people from across the globe. Our work helps the lives of millions, solving real-world problems through a huge network of partnerships and collaborations. The breadth and interdisciplinary nature of our research alongside our personalised approach to teaching sparks imaginative and inventive insights and solutions.

Through its research commercialisation arm, Oxford University Innovation, Oxford is the highest university patent filer in the UK and is ranked first in the UK for university spinouts, having created more than 200 new companies since 1988. Over a third of these companies have been created in the past three years. The university is a catalyst for prosperity in Oxfordshire and the United Kingdom, contributing £15.7 billion to the UK economy in 2018/19, and supports more than 28,000 full time jobs.

The Department of Biology is a University of Oxford department within the Maths, Physical and Life Sciences Division. It utilises academic strength in a broad range of bioscience disciplines to tackle global challenges such as food security, biodiversity loss, climate change and global pandemics. It also helps to train and equip the biologists of the future through holistic undergraduate and graduate courses. For more information visit www.biology.ox.ac.uk.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.