News Release

Research puts lens on a new vision for land use decision making

University of Leicester-led research provides a guide to better and more transparent decisions for our land

Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of Leicester

A new framework for making better and more transparent decisions about the use of our land could help to balance society’s demands upon it with protecting and enhancing the environment.

Researchers led by the University of Leicester have proposed a framework for decisions on land use, from nationwide policymaking to building happening at street level, that would involve the most representative range of stakeholders, from those with financial interests in the land to the local communities who use it and more besides.

Now published in the journal People and Nature, it encourages decisionmakers to gather evidence to consider from four distinct viewpoints, or ‘lenses’:

  • The Power and Market Gain lens is focused on the financial interests (profit) of organisations and people that have specific leverage over the decision area.
  • The Ecosystem Services lens focuses on the value environmental goods and services provide to society, framing land resources as assets essential for the flow of ecosystem services.
  • The Place-based Identity lens focuses on components of landscape character that are enshrined in the relationships between the local population and the landscapes and environments with which they co-identify.
  • The Ecocentric Lens offers a framework where, all species equally and the focus of decisions should rest on the health of ecosystems and biodiversity.

This framework aims to enable people to be transparent about the ways they've made a decision about a piece of land, be that policymakers, councils, government, land managers, communities or others. The researchers recommend that these four lenses should be embedded in any participatory decision-making around the governance of our landscapes.

Lead author Dr Beth Cole, an honorary researcher at the University of Leicester, said: “The need for this in landscape decisions is in how we make the best choices about the use of our land. It's not just how we maximise the outputs from our land, it's bigger than that.

“For decision makers, they need to ask if they are making sure that they are considering the community needs and the nuances within that, that they are thinking about things from the viewpoint of the whole ecological system, and thinking about how the outputs from processes in the environment will change depending upon what they do to that parcel of land?

“It's enabling people to make sure that all viewpoints that might be relevant are considered in a way that is equal, but balanced and transparent, so people can see that those things have been considered.”

The research is an output of the Landscape Decisions Programme, co-ordinated by the University of Leicester, which is examining how we better make use of our land, make decisions about natural assets and the land landscape of the UK.

The programme brought together a wide range of experts, including scientists, modellers, social scientists and artists, for a series of discussions and workshops bringing together research capable of enabling landscape decisions.

Dr Cole adds: “This work brings together multiple strands and viewpoints about how land is managed for the best output for everyone, be that people, be that species, be that ecosystems and biodiversity. It essentially says we need to consider everybody in society, and nature and the planet as well.”

Professor Heiko Balzter from the University of Leicester, who is coordinating the Landscape Decisions Programme funded by UK Research and Innovation, said: “The author team of this paper has brought together the findings from across the Landscape Decisions Programme. By looking at different ways of understanding our landscapes, the proposed joined-up approach sheds light on the consequences of taking particular landscape decisions from different perspectives.”

  • ‘Using a multi-lens framework for landscape decisions’ is published in People and Nature, DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10474

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.