image: T cells dynamically adapt to signals in the TME, transitioning between effector, exhausted, and regulatory states. Cellular interactions, metabolic stress, and physical barriers (e.g., ECM) shape their functions, influencing cancer progression and treatment responses. Targeting these mechanisms could enhance immunotherapy efficacy.
Credit: The corresponding authors Dr. Yi-Zhou Jian and Dr. Han Wan
T cells, the cornerstone of antitumor immunity, display remarkable heterogeneity and adaptability within the TME. As highlighted in the review by researchers from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, T cells can transition between effector, exhausted, and regulatory states in response to cues from tumor cells, immune cells, and metabolic stressors in the TME. For instance, CD8+ T cells can differentiate into progenitor exhausted (TPEX), effector (TEFF), or terminally exhausted (TTEX) subsets, with distinct cytotoxicity and antigen responsiveness . Meanwhile, CD4+ T cells, including Th1 (antitumor) and Tregs (pro-tumor), exhibit bidirectional roles in shaping immune responses.
Spatial organization within the TME further influences T-cell function. T cells in the tumor core face immunosuppressive cues like hypoxia and inhibitory receptors, while those at the invasive margin show enhanced activation and correlate with better therapeutic outcomes . Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), enriched in T cells and dendritic cells, emerge as critical hubs for antitumor immunity, with their presence linked to improved survival across solid tumors.
The review emphasizes three key regulatory layers of T-cell plasticity: cellular signals including direct cell-to-cell interactions and soluble factors like cytokines and chemokines that dictate T-cell activation or exhaustion; metabolic reprogramming where tumor-induced stress such as glucose depletion and lipid peroxidation impairs T-cell function while certain fatty acids support mitochondrial function; and physical and biological factors like extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, reactive oxygen species (ROS) with dual effects on T-cell activation and exhaustion, and the intratumoral microbiome modulating T-cell activity.
In terms of therapeutic strategies, the review outlines innovative approaches such as immune checkpoint therapy with combinations of PD-1 inhibitors and TGF-β blockers or bispecific antibodies, metabolic modulation targeting glucose or lipid metabolism to restore T-cell function, adoptive cell therapy with genetically engineered CAR-T cells having enhanced metabolic fitness, and spatial reprogramming by disrupting ECM barriers or enhancing TLS formation. The authors note challenges like tumor heterogeneity and off-target toxicity while emphasizing the need for spatial omics and single-cell technologies to decode T-cell dynamics for personalized therapies.
See the article:
Unlocking T‐Cell Plasticity in the Tumor Microenvironment: Implications for Cancer Progression and Therapeutic Strategies
https://doi.org/10.1002/mog2.70023
Article Title
Unlocking T‐Cell Plasticity in the Tumor Microenvironment: Implications for Cancer Progression and Therapeutic Strategies
Article Publication Date
24-May-2025