EurekAlert! Staff Picks

Each week, our team members share their favorite recent news releases, stories that caught their eye, sparked their curiosity, or made them think. We hope you’ll find them just as interesting!

Madalyn Stratton

Madalyn Stratton

Editorial & Membership Coordinator

Early tetrapods had surprisingly little ability to move their necks

The incredible artist’s recreation for this study brought my attention to this release about tetrapod backbones and the development of neck mobility. It has been a longstanding hypothesis that as early tetrapods moved to land, changes in their anatomy gave them improved neck mobility. However, researchers from Uppsala University have found evidence that overturns this theory. While higher neck mobility became an advantage over time, this was likely not an existing trait in early tetrapods.

Early tetrapods had a unique backbone compared to vertebrates today. They had a long rod of tissue called a notochord that ran through the entire vertebrae, which kept their vertebrae small and arranged around the soft tissue. Researchers created a model of the structure by applying material properties of the sturgeon, a distantly related fish, that has the same type of backbone. Researchers dissected backbones of sturgeons, tested their mobility, calculated the material stiffness of the tissue, and then applied this stiffness to extinct animals.

The findings of this model showed that the necks were surprisingly stiff, which limited their ability to raise or twist their heads despite the anatomical separation of the head and shoulders. This showed that neck mobility was not present in early tetrapod species and likely evolved later than previously thought, which offers incredible insight into these long extinct species!

Newly discovered hair cells on squid may offer clues to understand hearing loss in humans

Squids and cephalopods provide an unexpected opportunity for insight on human hearing. The research team discovered squids have bundles of hair-like protrusions lining their entire bodies. These hair cells are similar to those inside human ears that allow us to hear and could provide researchers valuable insight into human hearing and deafness. The hair cells inside the human ear have bundles of hair-like projections which send signals to the brain which are converted to meaningful sound.

The striking image of a squid taken using light sheet microscopy brought my attention to the intriguing research prospect from researchers at Case Western Reserve University. The imaging process allowed the team to build a detailed 3D image of the squid which brought focus to the previously unknown hair cells along the body of the squids. Sea creatures with these similar bundles can sense different frequencies within the water like how humans detect different pitches of sound. With this discovery, squid could be a model to understanding human hearing and give hope to hearing recovery research.

Largest-ever study of its kind shows California’s rodenticide restrictions are working, and flags new rodenticides rising in their place

I was brought back to the topic of barred owls in northwestern California with results from extensive research on the effects of rodenticide on owl populations. The study analyzed liver tissue from over a thousand Barred Owls in the area between 2019 and 2025 which showed that exposure to the most lethal pesticides in young owls decreased from around 50% in 2019 to 20% in 2025. This reduction in exposure coincides with California’s restrictions on rodenticide.

While these results are initially optimistic regarding the decrease in exposure, there is a new concern. A new type of rodenticide has been found for the first time in the population, appearing in about one in five owls. When counting exposure to all rodenticide types, roughly 46% of owls were still exposed to at least one type of rodenticide.

Exposure to these pesticides puts pressure on already threatened species like the Spotted Owl. These species are more likely to be affected by the use of rodenticide as rodents contain a higher proportion of their diets. While restrictions have been shown to help reduce exposure, illegal use of these products or lingering contamination may still contribute to ongoing threats. Further investigation into these unexpected sources may help to reduce the harm these chemicals cause to wildlife.