Civil defense units must invest in professionalization and own resources to face climate risks
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Updates every hour. Last Updated: 10-Nov-2025 00:11 ET (10-Nov-2025 05:11 GMT/UTC)
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Sandia National Laboratories is being credited with saving the Department of Energy $439 million as part of a more efficient way of doing business with suppliers. That’s more than any other DOE site nationwide.
The Met Office and the University of Exeter will host scientists, policy makers and business leaders for vital talks assessing growing risks from climate change – and action to address it.
Artificial intelligence could be affecting the scientific rigour of new research, according to a study from the University of Surrey.
In a new editorial in the AAAS publication Science & Diplomacy, Kimberly Montgomery, Director of International Affairs and Science Diplomacy at AAAS, reflects on whether the United States should develop a national science diplomacy strategy amid significant change to U.S. federal policy. Montgomery believes that the Trump administration should develop such a strategy – to help define a vision and direction for the U.S. It should outline how related policies “can advance U.S. diplomatic objectives, including fostering economic growth,” she writes. “And that strategy should detail how it will work with the private sector.” But for this to happen effectively, says Montgomery, the U.S. needs a stable and flourishing scientific ecosystem. She highlights challenges – including budget cuts for domestic science research, the firing of thousands of U.S. federal scientists, and the steep reduction of foreign aid that supports collaborative science projects abroad. “I am an optimist,” writes Montgomery, “but I am very concerned by the enactment of policies that harm the U.S. scientific ecosystem and damage our relationships with our allies.” Montgomery concludes: “Without changing course, I fear the question I will start being asked is not whether I agree with the diplomatic objectives that the Trump administration is pursuing…but rather whether the United States can develop a strong national science diplomacy strategy at all.” (Note for our reporter registrants: This Editorial was not published in a Science family journal, but in a AAAS publication. However, we thought it may be of interest to you and wanted to highlight it.)