Orphaned grizzly cubs released back into the wild rarely make it, but these changes could improve chances drastically
Peer-Reviewed Publication
This August, we're exploring the science behind the animals that share our planet. From the behaviors and adaptations that help species thrive to the conservation efforts protecting wildlife around the world, animal awareness days like World Lion Day, World Elephant Day, International Cat Day, and International Wolf Day are an opportunity to celebrate biodiversity and discover the research helping us better understand and protect the species that call our planet home.
Updates every hour. Last Updated: 23-Oct-2026 00:16 ET (23-Oct-2026 04:16 GMT/UTC)
Dr Lana Ciarniello is an independent wildlife research biologist and co-chair of the IUCN SSC Bear Specialist Group's human-bear conflict expert team. She is currently the principal investigator for the Orphaned Grizzly Bear Rewilding Project, which is the only rehabilitation and research program for grizzly bears in North America. In a new Frontiers in Conservation Science article, Ciarniello explores why current attempts to rehabilitate orphaned grizzly bears to the wilderness might be backfiring. Based on her findings from five years of monitoring rehabilitated grizzly cubs, she poses the question of whether rehabilitation programs in their current form are an effective conservation tool or sympathetic management.
For decades, research on wildlife parasites and pathogens has often relied on methods that require capturing, handling, or even euthanizing animals. These invasive approaches can impose considerable stress on wildlife. However, according to a recently published article by researchers at the HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, a growing number of modern, non-invasive methods, such as citizen science, digital epidemiology, and eDNA, are now available that enable the monitoring of parasites and pathogens without placing substantial stress or burden on wild animals, showing that in many cases, animals do not even need to be captured.
According to the authors, the growing adoption of non-invasive surveillance methods benefits nature conservation, animal health, and ultimately human health alike. These innovative tools enable earlier detection of emerging wildlife infections and provide a more accurate understanding of how pathogens and parasites spread, while making wildlife research more ethical and sustainable.