Study pinpoints how to minimize chances of dangerous wildlife encounters this summer
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Updates every hour. Last Updated: 31-Oct-2026 01:15 ET (31-Oct-2026 05:15 GMT/UTC)
Bears get a bad reputation, but a new study shows that they might not be the species most often involved in human-wildlife interaction that can lead to conflicts in national parks. Researchers examined which large mammals were most often involved in aggressive encounters between people and animals, during what type of activities run-ins were most likely to happen, and what combinations proved especially risky. Elk were most frequently involved in incidents, and most run-ins happened during low-impact activities – hikes and wildlife observation. Some animal-activity pairs emerged as particularly high-risk, such as running into mule deer while walking the dog. The team also highlighted simple but effective steps visitors can take to minimize their risk of aggressive encounters.
Researchers have identified key physiological and biochemical traits that help wheat maintain productivity under sodic (salt-affected) soil conditions. The study found that proline accumulation, potassium retention, and a favorable potassium-to-sodium ratio are strongly associated with grain yield under stress. These findings provide valuable tools for breeding salt-tolerant wheat varieties and improving food security in regions affected by soil salinity.
Tufts University is advancing this mission through a new collaboration with Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences in East Boothbay, Maine, giving graduate students direct access to immersive real-world ocean research.