How the brain responds to prices: Scientists discover neural marker for price perception
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Updates every hour. Last Updated: 9-Jun-2025 06:09 ET (9-Jun-2025 10:09 GMT/UTC)
Russian scientists have discovered how the brain makes purchasing decisions. Using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), researchers found that the brain responds almost instantly when a product's price deviates from expectations. This response engages brain regions involved in evaluating rewards and learning from past decisions. Thus, perceiving a product's value is not merely a conscious choice but also a function of automatic cognitive mechanisms. The results have been published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
A recent study by the University of Eastern Finland Business School indicates that elderly neurological patients show a willingness to accept remote monitoring (RM) in the home environment even in the pre-implementation phase. Home-based RM uses digital health technologies to track patients' health metrics and securely transmit data to healthcare professionals at the clinical site. RM at home includes wearable devices, and mobile health apps that monitor key health metrics (e.g., activity, sleep, heart rate). RM is particularly appealing to elderly patients who wish to age in their own home while maintaining their independence.
Scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, the University of Cologne, and the University of Copenhagen have uncovered a hidden talent of the Casparian strip—a root structure best known for acting like a plant’s security guard. It turns out this natural barrier also plays a key role in making sure legumes get the right amount of nitrogen from their bacterial partners. Their findings, now published in Science, could help researchers better understand how plants and microbes negotiate their underground business deals.
A new report has uncovered how investors can most effectively foster shareholder engagement on environmental, societal and governance (ESG) issues to overcome differences in structural and cultural climates around the world.
The report, titled Chains of influence, examines how power dynamics between asset owners and asset managers (‘active owners’), companies and other stakeholders vary significantly between different countries, and identifies two chains of influence – company-centric and owner-centric. The authors then outline opportunities for active owners to influence under-engaged companies across different global contexts.